What if All New York Times Headlines Ended With an Emoticon?

A large version of the shruggie emoticon.
The future of news.

“I can’t be absolutely sure, but I believe this is @nytimes’ first emoji headline ever,” Theodore Kim, an editor at the New York Times, tweeted on Tuesday, pointing to an article with the headline, “It’s Going to Snow Again. How Much? ¯\_(ツ)_/¯”

¯\_(ツ)_/¯ is, of course, the shruggie, a string of characters meant to convey, basically, “I dunno” or “Beats me.” (Stay on the internet long enough, apparently, and the weird typography trick you once read about on a now-closed indie blog four years ago will show up in a New York Times headline.) One could quibble with several of the assertions in Kim’s tweet—that the shruggie is an emoji at all rather than an emoticon, or that it’s the first emoticon to appear in a Times headline. (It’s not, and it’s not even the first time the shruggie made it into a headline.) One might also take issue with whether the shruggie is used correctly in the headline: Does a snowstorm really warrant the kind of nihilistic despair that the shruggie connotes?

Those questions are irrelevant, though, because the fact of the matter is that shruggie works. It clearly conveys the message of the headline, that we don’t know how much snow we’re going to get, even if it doesn’t necessarily add much meaning. (PSA: We never know how much snow we’re going to get.) Hey, what if—GALAXY BRAIN—all New York Times articles had emoticons in their headlines? Finally, the digital salve we’ve been looking for in this post-text world—guys, we’re pivoting to emoticons. With some help from, we’ve taken the liberty of adding appropriate emoticons to a selection of headlines in Tuesday’s New York Times. You’ll notice that they improve reading comprehension by approximately 1,000 percent.

Trump Reaffirms Commitment to Tariffs but Opens Door to Compromise ( ͡ᵔ ͜ʖ ͡ᵔ )

Trump’s Hopes of Being the ‘Neutral Guy’ in the Mideast Seem Long Gone ◉_◉

Behind Public Persona, the Real Xi Jinping Is a Guarded Secret ಠ_ಥ

Trying Again, de Blasio Names a New Schools Chancellor (☞゚ヮ゚)☞ ☜(゚ヮ゚☜)

Can This Judge Solve the Opioid Crisis? ಠ╭╮ಠ

Football’s Brain Injury Crisis Lands in Family Court ᕙ(⇀‸↼‶)ᕗ

Once Outspoken, Paul Ryan Wields His Speaker’s Gavel Gingerly (¬_¬)

Trump Hates the Trade Deficit. Most Economists Don’t. [̲̅$̲̅(̲̅5̲̅)̲̅$̲̅]

The Keys to the Kingdom: Saudi Women Learn to Drive (•_•) ( •_•)>⌐■-■ (⌐■_■)

Italy’s Surging Populists Run Into a Political Muddle. But for How Long? ◔̯◔

Trump Administration Stalls Largest Tech Merger in New Sign of Protectionism ༼ つ ಥ_ಥ ༽つ

A Shades of Gray Show That Was Genuinely Worth Watching (ᵔᴥᵔ)

First Ray, Then Patsy, Now Joe. Another Pizza War Breaks Out. (ง’̀-’́)ง

A Famed Doctor, a Troubled Prosecutor and a Case That Went Untried ༼ ºل͟º ༼ ºل͟º ༼ ºل͟º ༽ ºل͟º ༽ ºل͟º ༽

After Reviving the Royals, Hosmer and Cain Try to Spark Other Teams \ (•◡•) /

Trump Wants More Asylums — and Some Psychiatrists Agree ┬┴┬┴┤(・_├┬┴┬┴

‘Mister Rogers’ Neighborhood’ at 50: 5 Memorable Moments (▰˘◡˘▰)

Do these emoticons add any more meaning to these headlines than the shruggie added to that weather article? Is the whole emoticon-in-headline strategy actually just a gimmick? Have we all lost the ability and/or will to read anything longer than 50 characters? ¯\_(ツ)_/¯.

One more thing

You depend on Slate for sharp, distinctive coverage of the latest developments in politics and culture. Now we need to ask for your support.

Our work is more urgent than ever and is reaching more readers—but online advertising revenues don’t fully cover our costs, and we don’t have print subscribers to help keep us afloat. So we need your help. If you think Slate’s work matters, become a Slate Plus member. You’ll get exclusive members-only content and a suite of great benefits—and you’ll help secure Slate’s future.

Join Slate Plus
Heather Schwedel is a Slate staff writer.