Jurisprudence

Punished for Being Poor

The Virginia scheme that suspends the driver’s license of anyone who can’t pay trivial fines.

Getting pulled over in Virginia can mean losing the ability to work for many.

Karen Bleier/AFP/Getty Images

In the aftermath of the death of Michael Brown and subsequent events in Ferguson, the Justice Department revealed a shocking bit of news: Missouri police departments were systematically issuing trivial fines and court costs against their very poorest citizens to raise revenue for local government functions. Ta-Nehisi Coates described this at the time as “plunder made legal,” and on Friday, one neighboring municipality agreed to pay $4.7 million to 2,000 citizens who had faced such abuse. Perhaps the worst part of the Missouri grift lay in the revelation that this system was keeping some of the state’s very poorest citizens from any possibility of ever emerging out of a bottomless spiral of destitution, homelessness, and debt. Ferguson and other municipalities were essentially criminalizing being poor. Missouri was not alone in this, though, and this past week there were brand new revelations about another state’s pernicious tactic for turning poverty into a crime in a scheme just as damaging as the one that the Justice Department rightfully pilloried in the Show Me State.

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement

In Virginia, more than 900 people have lost their driver’s licenses because they couldn’t pay the court fees associated with having them restored. That means that indigent people who may have been pulled over for the most minor of infractions can lose their license unless they pay stiff penalties. Research has shown that most drivers with suspended or revoked licenses—including those who have lost licenses because of failure to pay a fine—keep driving anyhow, usually because there is no alternative way to get to work, take children to school, or make medical appointments. If these individuals are caught driving on a suspended license in Virginia, that is punishable by a year in jail and a fine of up to $2,500, which just pushes the already impoverished deeper into poverty.

Advertisement

A statewide federal class-action suit filed this past week in Virginia attempts to remedy this vicious cycle. The suit argues that by failing to inquire into the reason drivers can’t pay to have their licenses returned, the commonwealth is in violation of the Constitution’s “fundamental principles of due process and equal protection.” It further contends that the state apparatus has become a debtors’ prison, targeting the very poorest citizens. Whether the lack of a license means you are basically confined to your home, or literally subject to jail time, you’re effectively locked up for failing to pay fines.

Advertisement

As the suit notes, the Supreme Court has held that punishing a person just because they can’t afford to pay a fine, as opposed to a willful refusal to pay, is a violation of due process.

Advertisement

You can surely argue that driving is a privilege and not a right. But the nature of public transportation in the commonwealth suggests things should be otherwise. The complaint cites a report by the Brookings Institution that demonstrated that only 15 percent of jobs in the Virginia Beach, Norfolk, and Newport News areas were accessible by public transportation in a 90-minute travel window. Because the suspensions for failing to pay fines are automatic, approximately 1 in 6 Virginia drivers now has a suspended license for unpaid court costs and fines. A conviction for, say, reckless driving can lead to a six-month suspension of your license, but failure to pay court fees means you lose your license until your debt is settled. That can take years.

Advertisement

The suit was filed against Virginia’s Department of Motor Vehicles by the Charlottesville-based Legal Aid Justice Center. The 56-page complaint reads like a Dickens novel, detailing the Catch-22 sinkhole into which the four named plaintiffs have fallen, through illness and debt, along with the accumulated fines and fees that have prevented them from getting a license and cannot be paid off unless they are able to drive to work. One of the plaintiffs, Robert Taylor, owes nearly $4,400 in fines and fees plus interest that accrues at 6 percent every 41 days to at least four different Virginia courts. His license was suspended in 2013 due to an unpaid debt following a conviction for improper license plates, which meant that when he ran a red light in April 2014 while driving on a suspended license, he sunk deeper in the hole. Taylor, a National Guard veteran, is also facing more than $15,000 in medical and student loan debt. But he can’t get jobs because he cannot promise prospective employers that he can drive to work. In the meantime, the state just keeps raising the price tag.

Advertisement
Advertisement

As this piece in Law Street observes, even the initial fines are no small amount of money if you’re poor: “Drivers whose licenses have been suspended or revoked due to unpaid court fines face a $145 reinstatement fee from the Virginia DMV. To put that in some perspective, that would be equivalent to about 20 hours of wages for someone working at Virginia’s minimum wage of $7.25 an hour.”

The lawyers behind the suit have correctly argued that it is beyond pointless for the state to keep trying to squeeze money out of the very people for whom driving is the surest way to try to get out of poverty. Automatic suspensions for unpaid costs and fines represent almost two-thirds of all outstanding suspension and revocation orders at this point.

Advertisement

I asked Angela Ciolfi, one of the lawyers at the justice center, whether they can plausibly argue that we have a Constitutional right to our driver’s licenses. In response, she rattled off a list of precedents. One case, 1971’s Bell v. Burson, found that “once licenses are issued … their continued possession may become essential in the pursuit of a livelihood.” The cases cited involved the government’s interest in traffic safety, but these Virginia suspensions are purely about coercive payment regimes. “The question is not whether we can think of a penalty harsh enough to make people pay, the question is whether we have the right to make people forgo their basic needs,” Ciolfi told me. “Should paying the courts be a higher priority than paying child support, putting food on the table, or paying the rent?”

Advertisement
Advertisement

Criminalizing poverty is one of the most shortsighted policies in America today. We fill our jails with people who can’t afford to pay for their freedom, attempting to wring scraps of cash from those who must choose between fines and food. As Ciolfi puts it—paraphrasing the Equal Justice Initiative’s Bryan Stevenson—the question isn’t whether Virginia’s poorest citizens have a “right” to their driver’s licenses. It’s whether the commonwealth has a right to keep them from buying food, going to church, and earning a living, all because they couldn’t pay off petty fines associated with a broken taillight, or an expired plate. It makes no sense to jail people who are poor for trying to do the very things that could lift them out of poverty; better to repeal the laws requiring the suspension of driving privileges for non-traffic safety related reasons, than to see it become a one-way road into prison.

Advertisement