The Slatest

Don’t Take Al-Qaida’s Claim of Responsibility for the Paris Attack Too Seriously 

Nasser bin Ali al-Ansi, a leader of the Yemeni branch of al Qaeda.
Nasser Bin Ali al-Ansi, a leader of the Yemeni branch of al-Qaida, appears on televisions in Sanaa, Yemen, on Jan.14, 2015, as he delivers a message claiming responsibility for the attack on Charlie Hebdo.

Photo by Khaled Abdullah Ali Al Mahdi/Reuters

As expected, the Yemen-based affiliate al-Qaida in the Arabian Peninsula has claimed responsibility for the attack on Charlie Hebdo one week ago. “The one who chose the target, laid the plan and financed the operation is the leadership of the organization,” said the group’s statement, which also said the attack had been ordered by global al-Qaida leader Ayman al-Zawahiri and that late American-born cleric Anwar al-Awlaki played a part in the planning.

It would be a mistake to take the claim completely at face value. For one thing, as the New York Times noted on Twitter, AQAP has made dubious claims of responsibility before. In 2010, for instance, the group claimed to have caused the crash of a UPS cargo plane in Dubai as part of the foiled “package bomb plot” of that year, which involved sending freight packages carrying bombs to the United States. Investigators later determined that the UPS crash was caused by overheated lithium batteries. AQAP, evidently, simply decided to take advantage of the timing.

There is some established connection to AQAP this time, though. Said Kouachi is believed to have spent several months with the group in 2011 and, in an interview prior to his death, his brother Chérif claimed that they had been “sent by al-Qaida in Yemen” and “financed by Imam Anwar al-Awlaki.” Awlaki was killed by an American drone in 2011, and while it’s possible that the brothers continued to be in direct contact with AQAP and were acting under direct orders, it seems just as likely that they planned this on their own on the group’s behalf. (Certainly, AQAP had been urging its followers to attack Charlie Hebdo for a long time.)

While Zawahiri has himself expressed skepticism about unqualified actors hurting the al-Qaida brand by conducting operations under its banner, the “networked” model of terrorist attacks, in which bands of militants receive ideological inspiration and in some cases tactical training from a well-known group but operate more or less independently, is actually a great deal for groups like al-Qaida. It allows them them to expend minimal resources, maintain plausible deniability for failures, and every once in a while claim credit for spectacular successes.

While “lone wolf” and networked attacks are probably inevitable, 13 years after 9/11, Zawahiri and the al-Qaida leadership’s ability to coordinate spectacular attacks on the West has actually been severely degraded. Between the death of Osama Bin Laden, the brutally effective drone war, and the rise of new competition in ISIS, it’s been a rough few years for al-Qaida’s brand. Al-Qaida honchos have more than enough incentive to exaggerate their own role in a rare success in order to demonstrate that they’ve still got it.

Read more of Slate’s coverage of the Charlie Hebdo attacks.