Skip to the content
Sign In
Account
Activating this button will toggle the display of additional content
Account
Sign out
Slate homepage
Submit search
Enter query
Activating this button will toggle the display of additional content
Light
Dark
Auto
News & Politics
Culture
Technology
Business
Human Interest
Podcasts
Menu
Open menu
Close menu
News & Politics
Culture
Technology
Business
Human Interest
Podcasts
Search
Activating this button will toggle the display of additional content
Light
Dark
Auto
Follow us
Slate on Instagram
Slate on Twitter
Slate on Facebook
Subscribe
Sign in
Account
Sign out
Slate homepage
Account
*
Pulls Off a Couple Tricks of Editing
Follow Us
Slate on Instagram
Slate on Twitter
Slate on Facebook
Advertisement
Advertisement
← Return to Article
Comments on:
Could Scott Pruitt Have a Point?
The EPA is calling for more transparency in science. Yes, it’s hypocritical and ill-considered—but let’s be crystal clear about the potential benefits.
Advertisement
Please enable Javascript and cookies to read and post comments.
Advertisement
Could Scott Pruitt Have a Point?
The EPA is calling for more transparency in science. Yes, it’s hypocritical and ill-considered—but let’s be crystal clear about the potential benefits.