Moneybox

Airplane Wi-Fi’s Credibility Problem

The D.C.-San Francisco flight I took this morning didn’t have Wi-Fi on it, but the D.C.-Houston flight I was on last week did. And not just any in-flight Wi-Fi. There was a two-tier pricing structure where you were offered the option of paying more for faster service.

Pondering it, it struck me as an intriguing business problem. After all, having used in-flight Wi-Fi in the past I’ve often thought that I would in fact be willing to pay more for higher quality service. But when looking at the option to pay more for faster Internet, I hesitated. There’s a basic credibility problem. If I pay and the Internet still seems sluggish, I have no real redress. The flight attendants aren’t going to fix it. There’d be no real way to prove my experience was sub-par. And obviously even a very good provider is going to be subject to the occasional hiccup while providing access in flight. 

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement

But that dynamic is going to tend to keep the industry stuck in a bad equilibrium. If you can’t find a way to credibly offer an upscale service for a higher price, then there’s very little incentive to really invest in quality. And if customers’ typical in-flight Wi-Fi experience is bad (and that’s generally been my experience) it’ll tend to sour them on paying in the future.

So I thought to myself, whatever just pay the money—it’s for your work. You’ll write an item about it. And so I did. And guess what? It was far and away the fastest and most reliable in-flight Wi-Fi connection I’ve ever had.

Advertisement