
Pushing Back
Posted Friday, Dec. 8, 2006, at 5:06 AM ETThe New York Times, Washington Post, and Los Angeles Times lead, while the Wall Street Journal tops its worldwide newsbox, with President Bush appearing to reject the main suggestions offered by the Iraq Study Group. And he wasn't alone. On the day after the report was released, U.S. lawmakers and officials, as well as foreign leaders, reacted skeptically to the committee's recommendations.
USA Today leads with figures that show the number of reservists and members of the National Guard who claimed that they suffered negative consequences at their civilian jobs after returning from duty increased approximately 30 percent since 2002. In the fiscal year 2006, the Labor Department received 1,548 complaints from service members. Complaints vary, but reservists and National Guard members are sometimes fired, reassigned, or lose benefits after they go back to their civilian jobs. The paper emphasizes that the figures don't reflect the extent of the problem because many cases are resolved before reaching the Labor Department.
At a news conference held with British Prime Minister Tony Blair, Bush greatly reduced the already low expectations that he would implement two of the main ideas put forward by the ISG: combat troop withdrawal by early 2008 and one-on-one talks with Iran and Syria. "I don't think Jim Baker and Lee Hamilton expect us to accept every recommendation," Bush said. But, in fact, as the NYT and WP note, that is exactly the opposite of what Baker and Hamilton said when they expressed hope that their plan would be adopted whole.
At the news conference, Bush sort of admitted that things in Iraq perhaps aren't going as well as planned when he answered a reporter's question by saying, "You wanted frankness—I thought we would succeed quicker than we did. … And I am disappointed by the pace of success." The plan is now for Bush to receive the other reviews of the Iraq situation from the Pentagon, State Department, and National Security Council and then make an announcement about "the way forward" before Christmas.
President Bush once again talked about Iraq as part of a global struggle and described it as an essential fight to spread freedom and build "societies based on liberty" in the Middle East.
In the Senate, lawmakers questioned James Baker and Lee Hamilton on whether their recommendations for Iraq are truly feasible. Democratic senators wondered whether it was truly practical to think that Iran and Syria would be willing to help the United States. Sen. John McCain was the most skeptical when he questioned the commission's decision not to recommend more troops. As the Post notes, Baker and Hamilton recognized the risks of their recommendations but "essentially said no one else had a better idea." Hamilton also chastised Congress for not acting more forcefully to solve the problems in Iraq.
Baker asked that Congress accept the report in full and tried to dissuade its members from treating "this like a fruit salad and say, 'I like this but I don't like that.' " They hoped lawmakers would endorse the report and use it to pressure Bush, but that seems unlikely, particularly with comments like that of Rep. Neil Abercrombie, D-Hawaii, who criticized the ISG recommendations and described them as "devoid of any basis in reality" because they can't be carried out.
For his part, Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert criticized the report and disagreed with an "attempt to create a linkage between the Iraqi issue and that of the Middle East." But Palestinian leaders praised the report and said it could be a chance to bring back the peace process.
The LAT fronts a look at how conservatives have been strongly criticizing many of the ISG's findings. Rush Limbaugh referred to the commission as the Iraq Surrender Group, and other conservative media outlets spent yesterday disagreeing with the group's recommendations, particularly referring to its calls to engage in talks with Iran and Syria.
In Iraq, the U.S. military said another service member was killed on Wednesday, which brings the total number of troop deaths on that day to 11. Another U.S. soldier was killed yesterday in Anbar province.
Disclosure: Slate is owned by the Washington Post Co. Don't understand Today's Papers jargon? Check out the Today's Papers glossary. Get Today's Papers free in your mailbox. Having trouble receiving Today's Papers?












Is It More Important for Your Turkey To Be Organic or Local?
Why Gift Cards Are a Terrible Gift
Is Sarah Palin's Approval Rating Really as High as Barack Obama's?
Justice Scalia's Most Eccentric Habits
Adam Lambert's Refreshing Non-Apology on the CBS Early Show
Democrats Have a Lot To Be Thankful For