<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://www.slate.com/blogs/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>The XX Factor : sex discrimination</title><link>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/sex+discrimination/default.aspx</link><description>Tags: sex discrimination</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP2 (Build: 61129.2)</generator><item><title>Ruth Bader Ginsburg Ain't No Oprah Winfrey</title><link>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/2009/05/19/ruth-bader-ginsburg-ain-t-no-oprah-winfrey.aspx</link><pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 13:09:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">b38b617e-fbf1-4816-b2a6-f11ec83af8cb:5612</guid><dc:creator>Dahlia Lithwick</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/comments/5612.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/commentrss.aspx?PostID=5612</wfw:commentRss><description>The Supreme Court ruled, 7-2 yesterday in AT&amp;amp;T v. Hulteen , that women denied credits toward their pension for their pregnancies in the 1960s and '70s—before it became illegal—were not the victims of gender discrimination. The question came down to...(&lt;a href="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/2009/05/19/ruth-bader-ginsburg-ain-t-no-oprah-winfrey.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://www.slate.com/blogs/aggbug.aspx?PostID=5612" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/Supreme+Court/default.aspx">Supreme Court</category><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/sex+discrimination/default.aspx">sex discrimination</category><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/Ruth+Bader+Ginsburg/default.aspx">Ruth Bader Ginsburg</category><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/AT_2600_amp_3B00_T+v.+Hulteen/default.aspx">AT&amp;amp;T v. Hulteen</category><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/empathy/default.aspx">empathy</category></item><item><title>Whatever You Say, Senator</title><link>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/2008/03/27/whatever-you-say-senator.aspx</link><pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2008 00:28:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">b38b617e-fbf1-4816-b2a6-f11ec83af8cb:2273</guid><dc:creator>Melinda Henneberger</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/comments/2273.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/commentrss.aspx?PostID=2273</wfw:commentRss><description>Judith, I agree that the right messenger (at the right moment) could deliver most of your speech on gender. But maybe it would be easier for a woman to achieve liftoff. Anybody else remember Nicole Hollander 's Sylvia cartoon on the wage gap? From her...(&lt;a href="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/2008/03/27/whatever-you-say-senator.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://www.slate.com/blogs/aggbug.aspx?PostID=2273" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/feminism/default.aspx">feminism</category><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/Hillary+Clinton/default.aspx">Hillary Clinton</category><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/culture/default.aspx">culture</category><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/miscellaneous/default.aspx">miscellaneous</category><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/education/default.aspx">education</category><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/gender+issues/default.aspx">gender issues</category><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/sex+discrimination/default.aspx">sex discrimination</category><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/prostitution/default.aspx">prostitution</category><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/day+care/default.aspx">day care</category></item><item><title>That's Why They're in Treatment ...</title><link>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/2008/03/19/that-s-why-they-re-in-treatment.aspx</link><pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2008 21:04:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">b38b617e-fbf1-4816-b2a6-f11ec83af8cb:2107</guid><dc:creator>Melinda Henneberger</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/comments/2107.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/commentrss.aspx?PostID=2107</wfw:commentRss><description>In a newsroom, you see right away that a high percentage of people who would like you to write about them — people with serious grievances of all kinds, against the cops or the city or the hospital or whatever — are at least a little bit crazy. Unfortunately,...(&lt;a href="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/2008/03/19/that-s-why-they-re-in-treatment.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://www.slate.com/blogs/aggbug.aspx?PostID=2107" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/Barack+Obama/default.aspx">Barack Obama</category><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/Hillary+Clinton/default.aspx">Hillary Clinton</category><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/sex+discrimination/default.aspx">sex discrimination</category><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/middle-aged+women/default.aspx">middle-aged women</category><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/race/default.aspx">race</category><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/campaign+2008/default.aspx">campaign 2008</category><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/Jeremiah+Wright/default.aspx">Jeremiah Wright</category></item><item><title>Hillary's Moment, and the Problem of "Seeming" Sexism</title><link>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/2008/01/08/hillary-s-moment-and-the-problem-of-seeming-sexism.aspx</link><pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2008 15:41:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">b38b617e-fbf1-4816-b2a6-f11ec83af8cb:689</guid><dc:creator>Meghan O'Rourke</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/comments/689.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/commentrss.aspx?PostID=689</wfw:commentRss><description>I thought Gloria Steinem's op-ed in the New York Times today performed an important service: It aptly—but gently—reminded us that it’s really hard to talk about sexism in this country. Partly that's because most of us, as Steinem points out, don’t like...(&lt;a href="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/2008/01/08/hillary-s-moment-and-the-problem-of-seeming-sexism.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://www.slate.com/blogs/aggbug.aspx?PostID=689" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/Hillary+Clinton/default.aspx">Hillary Clinton</category><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/sex+discrimination/default.aspx">sex discrimination</category><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/_2700_08+election/default.aspx">'08 election</category></item><item><title>What Are You Laughing At?</title><link>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/2007/11/14/what-are-you-laughing-at.aspx</link><pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2007 20:47:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">b38b617e-fbf1-4816-b2a6-f11ec83af8cb:224</guid><dc:creator>Melinda Henneberger</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/comments/224.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/commentrss.aspx?PostID=224</wfw:commentRss><description>I'm with Emily . Despite my irrational and - until now, at least -- enduring soft spot for John McCain , laughing one's senatorial socks off when a colleague is called the B word is no less objectionable than if he had indulged a (theoretical) Obama hater...(&lt;a href="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/2007/11/14/what-are-you-laughing-at.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://www.slate.com/blogs/aggbug.aspx?PostID=224" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/Hillary+Clinton/default.aspx">Hillary Clinton</category><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/sex+discrimination/default.aspx">sex discrimination</category><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/_2700_08+election/default.aspx">'08 election</category><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/gender+stereotype/default.aspx">gender stereotype</category></item><item><title>Titties, Beer, and Breast Cancer</title><link>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/2007/10/31/titties-beer-and-breast-cancer.aspx</link><pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2007 19:03:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">b38b617e-fbf1-4816-b2a6-f11ec83af8cb:128</guid><dc:creator>Meghan O'Rourke</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/comments/128.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/commentrss.aspx?PostID=128</wfw:commentRss><description>Today's the last day of Breast Cancer Awareness Month and some bloggers are arguing that the ubiquitous " pink-ribbon " approach has gone too far . (See the second panel.) Over at The Assertive Cancer Patient you can find a critique of the relentless...(&lt;a href="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/2007/10/31/titties-beer-and-breast-cancer.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://www.slate.com/blogs/aggbug.aspx?PostID=128" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/sex+discrimination/default.aspx">sex discrimination</category><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/breast+cancer/default.aspx">breast cancer</category></item><item><title>Darren Mack Trial and Fathers Rights</title><link>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/2007/10/24/darren-mack-trial-and-fathers-rights.aspx</link><pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2007 13:59:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">b38b617e-fbf1-4816-b2a6-f11ec83af8cb:83</guid><dc:creator>Dahlia Lithwick</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/comments/83.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/commentrss.aspx?PostID=83</wfw:commentRss><description>I must confess to a more than passing obsession with the Darren Mack trial, which gets under way today in Las Vegas . Mack stands accused of fatally stabbing his estranged wife Charla with their 7-year-old daughter upstairs in the home, then shooting...(&lt;a href="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/2007/10/24/darren-mack-trial-and-fathers-rights.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://www.slate.com/blogs/aggbug.aspx?PostID=83" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/courts/default.aspx">courts</category><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/law/default.aspx">law</category><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/sex+discrimination/default.aspx">sex discrimination</category></item><item><title>Mukasey and Sex Discrimination</title><link>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/2007/10/17/mukasey-and-sex-discrimination.aspx</link><pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2007 21:03:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">b38b617e-fbf1-4816-b2a6-f11ec83af8cb:63</guid><dc:creator>Emily Bazelon</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/comments/63.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/commentrss.aspx?PostID=63</wfw:commentRss><description>At today's confirmaton hearing for Michael Mukasey, Bush's pick for attorney general, Sen. Dianne Feinstein asked questions about a disturbing ruling Mukasey made as a federal judge in the Southern District of New York. Here are the facts (I just looked...(&lt;a href="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/2007/10/17/mukasey-and-sex-discrimination.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://www.slate.com/blogs/aggbug.aspx?PostID=63" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/Michael+Mukasey/default.aspx">Michael Mukasey</category><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/sex+discrimination/default.aspx">sex discrimination</category><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/attorney+general/default.aspx">attorney general</category></item></channel></rss>