<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://www.slate.com/blogs/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>The XX Factor : senate</title><link>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/senate/default.aspx</link><description>Tags: senate</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP2 (Build: 61129.2)</generator><item><title>Specter v. Souter</title><link>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/2009/05/01/specter-v-souter.aspx</link><pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2009 14:39:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">b38b617e-fbf1-4816-b2a6-f11ec83af8cb:5459</guid><dc:creator>Ann Hulbert</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/comments/5459.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/commentrss.aspx?PostID=5459</wfw:commentRss><description>The spectacle of Senator Arlen Specter surely had nothing to do with Justice David Souter's timing — if indeed reports of his retirement plans are true. But it's a pointed, and also rather poignant, contrast. The almost-80-year-old guy who's got every...(&lt;a href="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/2009/05/01/specter-v-souter.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://www.slate.com/blogs/aggbug.aspx?PostID=5459" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/Supreme+Court/default.aspx">Supreme Court</category><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/senate/default.aspx">senate</category><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/arlen+specter/default.aspx">arlen specter</category><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/retirement/default.aspx">retirement</category><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/David+Souter/default.aspx">David Souter</category></item><item><title>Caroline's Law?</title><link>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/2009/01/21/caroline-s-law.aspx</link><pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 03:43:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">b38b617e-fbf1-4816-b2a6-f11ec83af8cb:4395</guid><dc:creator>Emily Bazelon</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/comments/4395.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/commentrss.aspx?PostID=4395</wfw:commentRss><description>I'm glad to see Caroline Kennedy out of the running as well. But what mainly strikes me about the travails of this season's Senate vacancies is a point Slate 's Bruce Reed made weeks ago : They illustrate what a bad idea it is to give governors the power...(&lt;a href="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/2009/01/21/caroline-s-law.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://www.slate.com/blogs/aggbug.aspx?PostID=4395" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/Supreme+Court/default.aspx">Supreme Court</category><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/senate/default.aspx">senate</category><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/caroline+Kennedy/default.aspx">caroline Kennedy</category></item><item><title>Good Choice by Caroline</title><link>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/2009/01/21/good-choice-by-caroline.aspx</link><pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 02:26:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">b38b617e-fbf1-4816-b2a6-f11ec83af8cb:4394</guid><dc:creator>Emily Yoffe</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/comments/4394.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/commentrss.aspx?PostID=4394</wfw:commentRss><description>I agree, Noreen , that it's hard to believe her uncle's health is the reason Caroline Kennedy has withdrawn from consideration for replacing Hillary Clinton as a senator. His grave illness is the kind of thing that makes Kennedys want to make sure another...(&lt;a href="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/2009/01/21/good-choice-by-caroline.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://www.slate.com/blogs/aggbug.aspx?PostID=4394" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/Ted+Kennedy/default.aspx">Ted Kennedy</category><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/senate/default.aspx">senate</category><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/caroline+Kennedy/default.aspx">caroline Kennedy</category></item><item><title>Political Nepotism </title><link>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/2008/12/18/political-nepotism.aspx</link><pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 19:46:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">b38b617e-fbf1-4816-b2a6-f11ec83af8cb:4205</guid><dc:creator>Marjorie Valbrun</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/comments/4205.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/commentrss.aspx?PostID=4205</wfw:commentRss><description>Emily Y ., Emily B ., and Melinda , you all make very important and good points about Caroline Kennedy's possible anointment/appointment to Hillary Clinton's Senate seat. The level of nepotism in Congress is unseemly and does send a negative message to...(&lt;a href="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/2008/12/18/political-nepotism.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://www.slate.com/blogs/aggbug.aspx?PostID=4205" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/Hillary+Clinton/default.aspx">Hillary Clinton</category><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/politics/default.aspx">politics</category><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/senate/default.aspx">senate</category><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/caroline+Kennedy/default.aspx">caroline Kennedy</category><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/nepotism/default.aspx">nepotism</category></item><item><title>She's Not Palin</title><link>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/2008/12/16/she-s-not-palin.aspx</link><pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 03:52:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">b38b617e-fbf1-4816-b2a6-f11ec83af8cb:4194</guid><dc:creator>Emily Yoffe</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/comments/4194.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/commentrss.aspx?PostID=4194</wfw:commentRss><description>Emily B , great catch on Caroline Kennedy selling her mother's handbags as tag sale dreck. I also agree with you that however admirable her volunteer work is, it's ridiculous to say this qualifies her for appointment to the Senate (even while acknowledging...(&lt;a href="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/2008/12/16/she-s-not-palin.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://www.slate.com/blogs/aggbug.aspx?PostID=4194" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/Sarah+Palin/default.aspx">Sarah Palin</category><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/senate/default.aspx">senate</category><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/caroline+Kennedy/default.aspx">caroline Kennedy</category></item><item><title>Caroline, Meet Sarah</title><link>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/2008/12/16/caroline-meet-sarah.aspx</link><pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 01:49:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">b38b617e-fbf1-4816-b2a6-f11ec83af8cb:4193</guid><dc:creator>Emily Bazelon</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/comments/4193.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/commentrss.aspx?PostID=4193</wfw:commentRss><description>Melinda , I see the appeal of framing whether Caroline Kennedy should get to be New York's senator in terms of whether she'd be good at it. But why should we take only her measure, as opposed to weigh her against other candidates? I'm with my fellow Emily...(&lt;a href="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/2008/12/16/caroline-meet-sarah.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://www.slate.com/blogs/aggbug.aspx?PostID=4193" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/Sarah+Palin/default.aspx">Sarah Palin</category><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/senate/default.aspx">senate</category><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/caroline+Kennedy/default.aspx">caroline Kennedy</category></item><item><title>Not Caroline</title><link>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/2008/12/15/not-caroline.aspx</link><pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2008 21:20:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">b38b617e-fbf1-4816-b2a6-f11ec83af8cb:4183</guid><dc:creator>Emily Yoffe</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/comments/4183.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/commentrss.aspx?PostID=4183</wfw:commentRss><description>So, Caroline Kennedy has apparently decided she would like her Uncle Robert's Senate seat (about to evacuated by Hillary Clinton). One of the refreshing things about Caroline supporting the presidential race of Barack Obama over Clinton was that it signaled...(&lt;a href="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/2008/12/15/not-caroline.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://www.slate.com/blogs/aggbug.aspx?PostID=4183" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/Hillary+Clinton/default.aspx">Hillary Clinton</category><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/Obama/default.aspx">Obama</category><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/senate/default.aspx">senate</category><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/caroline+Kennedy/default.aspx">caroline Kennedy</category></item></channel></rss>