<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://www.slate.com/blogs/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>The XX Factor : evolutionary psychology, gender issues</title><link>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/evolutionary+psychology/gender+issues/default.aspx</link><description>Tags: evolutionary psychology, gender issues</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP2 (Build: 61129.2)</generator><item><title>Evolutionary Psychology: Bad Science, Bad Journalism, or Both?</title><link>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/2007/11/19/evolutionary-psychology-bad-science-bad-journalism-or-both.aspx</link><pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 21:58:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">b38b617e-fbf1-4816-b2a6-f11ec83af8cb:270</guid><dc:creator>Rachael Larimore</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/comments/270.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/commentrss.aspx?PostID=270</wfw:commentRss><description>Our evolutionary psychology discussion has had me on the lookout for stories that seem particularly ridiculous. And on Fox News today, the morning hosts mentioned a study that purports to show that gentlemen preferred blondes as far back as the Ice Age....(&lt;a href="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/2007/11/19/evolutionary-psychology-bad-science-bad-journalism-or-both.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://www.slate.com/blogs/aggbug.aspx?PostID=270" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/gender+issues/default.aspx">gender issues</category><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/women+and+science/default.aspx">women and science</category><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/evolutionary+psychology/default.aspx">evolutionary psychology</category><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/blondes/default.aspx">blondes</category></item><item><title>Why 9/11 Means More Daughters</title><link>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/2007/11/16/why-9-11-means-more-daughters.aspx</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2007 20:23:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">b38b617e-fbf1-4816-b2a6-f11ec83af8cb:255</guid><dc:creator>Morgan Smith</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/comments/255.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/commentrss.aspx?PostID=255</wfw:commentRss><description>If a woman's stressed during pregnancy will she not have a son? A piece in the new issue of the Economist suggests a connection between maternal stress and a baby's gender. Here's the theory: First World women are 5 percent more likely to have a male...(&lt;a href="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/2007/11/16/why-9-11-means-more-daughters.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://www.slate.com/blogs/aggbug.aspx?PostID=255" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/pregnancy/default.aspx">pregnancy</category><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/gender+issues/default.aspx">gender issues</category><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/evolutionary+psychology/default.aspx">evolutionary psychology</category></item><item><title>Hard-Wire This!</title><link>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/2007/11/13/hard-wire-this.aspx</link><pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2007 21:01:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">b38b617e-fbf1-4816-b2a6-f11ec83af8cb:213</guid><dc:creator>Dana Stevens</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/comments/213.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/commentrss.aspx?PostID=213</wfw:commentRss><description>I just had to join in with a "hear, hear" for stamping out evolutionary psychology (at least in its pop-science incarnation.). Now that I have a child of my own, I'm constantly eavesdropping on playground conversations about which behaviors are "hard-wired"...(&lt;a href="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/2007/11/13/hard-wire-this.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://www.slate.com/blogs/aggbug.aspx?PostID=213" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/parenting/default.aspx">parenting</category><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/gender+issues/default.aspx">gender issues</category><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/evolutionary+psychology/default.aspx">evolutionary psychology</category></item><item><title>Evolutionary Strippers</title><link>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/2007/11/13/evolutionary-strippers.aspx</link><pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2007 15:42:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">b38b617e-fbf1-4816-b2a6-f11ec83af8cb:211</guid><dc:creator>Emily Yoffe</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/comments/211.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/commentrss.aspx?PostID=211</wfw:commentRss><description>Meghan , Anne , Here's another recent study to add to the pile of questionable evolutionary psychology findings about women's sexual signaling—the evo psychs are obsessed with proving that women on their fertile days actually do experience estrus like...(&lt;a href="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/2007/11/13/evolutionary-strippers.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://www.slate.com/blogs/aggbug.aspx?PostID=211" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/gender+issues/default.aspx">gender issues</category><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/evolutionary+psychology/default.aspx">evolutionary psychology</category><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/sexuality/default.aspx">sexuality</category><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/strippers/default.aspx">strippers</category></item><item><title>The Utter Phoniness of Evolutionary Psychology </title><link>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/2007/11/12/the-utter-phoniness-of-evolutionary-psychology.aspx</link><pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2007 04:19:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">b38b617e-fbf1-4816-b2a6-f11ec83af8cb:206</guid><dc:creator>Anne Applebaum</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/comments/206.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/commentrss.aspx?PostID=206</wfw:commentRss><description>It's taken a long time, but at last— thank you for contributing , Meghan!—evolutionary psychology is being revealed as the psuedoscience it usually is, at least by the time it reaches the newspaper columns and the conversations around the water cooler....(&lt;a href="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/2007/11/12/the-utter-phoniness-of-evolutionary-psychology.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://www.slate.com/blogs/aggbug.aspx?PostID=206" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/gender+issues/default.aspx">gender issues</category><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/evolutionary+psychology/default.aspx">evolutionary psychology</category></item><item><title>Evolutionary Psychology Strikes Again</title><link>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/2007/11/12/evolutionary-psychology-strikes-again.aspx</link><pubDate>Mon, 12 Nov 2007 21:58:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">b38b617e-fbf1-4816-b2a6-f11ec83af8cb:204</guid><dc:creator>Meghan O'Rourke</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/comments/204.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/commentrss.aspx?PostID=204</wfw:commentRss><description>The trouble with evolutionary psychology is that there are no (or few) ways of testing its theorems. With enough ingenuity on the part of the researcher, nearly any finding about gender can be twisted to suit the evolutionary lens. Prime example, from...(&lt;a href="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/2007/11/12/evolutionary-psychology-strikes-again.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://www.slate.com/blogs/aggbug.aspx?PostID=204" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/gender+issues/default.aspx">gender issues</category><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/evolutionary+psychology/default.aspx">evolutionary psychology</category></item></channel></rss>