<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://www.slate.com/blogs/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>The XX Factor : Hollywood</title><link>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/Hollywood/default.aspx</link><description>Tags: Hollywood</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP2 (Build: 61129.2)</generator><item><title>To Be Young, Gifted, and White in Hollywood</title><link>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/2010/02/06/to-be-young-gifted-and-white-in-hollywood.aspx</link><pubDate>Sat, 06 Feb 2010 16:35:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">b38b617e-fbf1-4816-b2a6-f11ec83af8cb:7383</guid><dc:creator>Nina Shen Rastogi</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/comments/7383.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/commentrss.aspx?PostID=7383</wfw:commentRss><description>The blogosphere is a-twitter about Vanity Fair ’s latest “New Hollywood” cover. Specifically, its stark lily-whiteness. As Dlisted put it , this year’s annual Annie Leibovitz shot “makes a BYU class picture look like a Benetton ad.” Bloggers have pointed...(&lt;a href="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/2010/02/06/to-be-young-gifted-and-white-in-hollywood.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://www.slate.com/blogs/aggbug.aspx?PostID=7383" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/race/default.aspx">race</category><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/Hollywood/default.aspx">Hollywood</category><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/Vanity+Fair/default.aspx">Vanity Fair</category><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/actresses/default.aspx">actresses</category><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/adam+gopnik/default.aspx">adam gopnik</category><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/catcher+in+the+rye/default.aspx">catcher in the rye</category><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/huckleberry+finn/default.aspx">huckleberry finn</category><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/great+gatsby/default.aspx">great gatsby</category></item><item><title>And the Oscar for Best, Uh, Directress Goes To ...</title><link>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/2010/01/15/and-the-oscar-for-best-uh-directress-goes-to.aspx</link><pubDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2010 20:16:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">b38b617e-fbf1-4816-b2a6-f11ec83af8cb:7238</guid><dc:creator>Samantha Henig</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/comments/7238.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/commentrss.aspx?PostID=7238</wfw:commentRss><description>A post from DoubleX contributors: Dana rightly points out that the nongendered category of Best Director leads to a mostly male list of honorees. But does anyone think the best response to this is to add an award for "Best Directress"? Doesn't that smack...(&lt;a href="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/2010/01/15/and-the-oscar-for-best-uh-directress-goes-to.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://www.slate.com/blogs/aggbug.aspx?PostID=7238" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/gender+issues/default.aspx">gender issues</category><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/Golden+Globes/default.aspx">Golden Globes</category><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/Oscars/default.aspx">Oscars</category><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/Hollywood/default.aspx">Hollywood</category></item><item><title>Clinton/Lewinsky Scandal To Become HBO Movie</title><link>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/2009/03/25/clinton-lewinsky-scandal-to-become-hbo-movie.aspx</link><pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 20:41:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">b38b617e-fbf1-4816-b2a6-f11ec83af8cb:5088</guid><dc:creator>Susannah Breslin</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/comments/5088.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/commentrss.aspx?PostID=5088</wfw:commentRss><description>Just when you thought it was safe to channel surf, it turns out HBO is making a movie out of the Bill Clinton/Monica Lewinsky scandal of yesteryear. The title? The Special Relationship . Special , indeed. The casting is just plain odd. Dennis Quaid is...(&lt;a href="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/2009/03/25/clinton-lewinsky-scandal-to-become-hbo-movie.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://www.slate.com/blogs/aggbug.aspx?PostID=5088" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/Hillary+Clinton/default.aspx">Hillary Clinton</category><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/politics/default.aspx">politics</category><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/Bill+Clinton/default.aspx">Bill Clinton</category><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/movies/default.aspx">movies</category><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/sex/default.aspx">sex</category><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/Monica+Lewinsky/default.aspx">Monica Lewinsky</category><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/Hollywood/default.aspx">Hollywood</category><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/Tony+Blair/default.aspx">Tony Blair</category></item><item><title>Still More Reason to Lock Up Your Daughters</title><link>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/2009/03/20/still-more-reason-to-lock-up-your-daughters.aspx</link><pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2009 16:41:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">b38b617e-fbf1-4816-b2a6-f11ec83af8cb:5043</guid><dc:creator>Kerry Howley</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/comments/5043.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/commentrss.aspx?PostID=5043</wfw:commentRss><description>The talk of teacups and helicopters has me thinking about Taken , the fourth most popular movie in America and a film engineered to play on the worst, most irrational fears of American fathers—think Babel plus white slavery. A former CIA agent played...(&lt;a href="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/2009/03/20/still-more-reason-to-lock-up-your-daughters.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://www.slate.com/blogs/aggbug.aspx?PostID=5043" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/pop+culture/default.aspx">pop culture</category><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/virginity/default.aspx">virginity</category><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/Hollywood/default.aspx">Hollywood</category></item><item><title>Old Spice</title><link>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/2009/03/10/old-spice.aspx</link><pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 17:44:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">b38b617e-fbf1-4816-b2a6-f11ec83af8cb:4908</guid><dc:creator>Dahlia Lithwick</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/comments/4908.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/commentrss.aspx?PostID=4908</wfw:commentRss><description>Susannah . The headline here is actually kind of worse than “Julia Roberts is OLD.” The headline — or subhed — is the coy suggestion that “Julia Roberts is a superstar, but her box-office reign might be over.” Then the piece is packed with arguments (as...(&lt;a href="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/2009/03/10/old-spice.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://www.slate.com/blogs/aggbug.aspx?PostID=4908" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/motherhood/default.aspx">motherhood</category><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/Julia+Roberts/default.aspx">Julia Roberts</category><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/Hollywood/default.aspx">Hollywood</category><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/ageism/default.aspx">ageism</category></item><item><title>One Wedding, Three Children and ... a Funeral?</title><link>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/2009/03/10/one-wedding-three-children-and-a-funeral.aspx</link><pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 17:10:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">b38b617e-fbf1-4816-b2a6-f11ec83af8cb:4911</guid><dc:creator>Dana Stevens</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/comments/4911.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/commentrss.aspx?PostID=4911</wfw:commentRss><description>More for Susannah on Julia Roberts: I don't think either Dahlia or I were motivated to tear into that Newsweek piece on her by our undying love for America's sweetheart. Rather, we were struck by the article's disingenuousness, what I called its "eyelash-batting"...(&lt;a href="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/2009/03/10/one-wedding-three-children-and-a-funeral.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://www.slate.com/blogs/aggbug.aspx?PostID=4911" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/motherhood/default.aspx">motherhood</category><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/Julia+Roberts/default.aspx">Julia Roberts</category><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/Hollywood/default.aspx">Hollywood</category><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/Newsweek/default.aspx">Newsweek</category><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/aging/default.aspx">aging</category></item><item><title>That's Hollywood Ancient</title><link>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/2009/03/10/that-s-hollywood-ancient.aspx</link><pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 16:41:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">b38b617e-fbf1-4816-b2a6-f11ec83af8cb:4907</guid><dc:creator>Susannah Breslin</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/comments/4907.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/commentrss.aspx?PostID=4907</wfw:commentRss><description>Count me out on crying "sexism!" when it comes to Newsweek 's characterization of Julia Roberts as "Hollywood ancient." And that's exactly what the author said — Hollywood ancient — and you know what? He's absolutely right. By the response here, you'd...(&lt;a href="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/2009/03/10/that-s-hollywood-ancient.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://www.slate.com/blogs/aggbug.aspx?PostID=4907" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/movies/default.aspx">movies</category><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/sexism/default.aspx">sexism</category><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/Julia+Roberts/default.aspx">Julia Roberts</category><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/celebrity/default.aspx">celebrity</category><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/Hollywood/default.aspx">Hollywood</category></item><item><title>Pretty (Old) Woman</title><link>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/2009/03/10/pretty-old-woman.aspx</link><pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 14:51:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">b38b617e-fbf1-4816-b2a6-f11ec83af8cb:4905</guid><dc:creator>Dana Stevens</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/comments/4905.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/commentrss.aspx?PostID=4905</wfw:commentRss><description>Yuck. Like Dahlia , I hate the way this Newsweek article on Julia Roberts perpetuates sexist assumptions — 41-year-old women are "ancient"! Time off to raise children = career suicide! — while batting its eyelashes innocently. The author is effectively...(&lt;a href="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/2009/03/10/pretty-old-woman.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://www.slate.com/blogs/aggbug.aspx?PostID=4905" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/motherhood/default.aspx">motherhood</category><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/Julia+Roberts/default.aspx">Julia Roberts</category><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/Hollywood/default.aspx">Hollywood</category><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/Newsweek/default.aspx">Newsweek</category><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/aging/default.aspx">aging</category></item><item><title>Hollywood Ancient</title><link>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/2009/03/10/hollywood-ancient.aspx</link><pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 13:23:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">b38b617e-fbf1-4816-b2a6-f11ec83af8cb:4904</guid><dc:creator>Dahlia Lithwick</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/comments/4904.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/commentrss.aspx?PostID=4904</wfw:commentRss><description>Jamie Foxx. Paul Giamatti. Benicio Del Toro. Liev Schreiber. Guy Pearce. Philip Seymour Hoffman . Pretty safe bet that if any one of these 41-year-old actors had been the subject of this Newsweek piece they wouldn’t have been run through the gender double-standard...(&lt;a href="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/2009/03/10/hollywood-ancient.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://www.slate.com/blogs/aggbug.aspx?PostID=4904" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/motherhood/default.aspx">motherhood</category><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/Julia+Roberts/default.aspx">Julia Roberts</category><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/Hollywood/default.aspx">Hollywood</category></item></channel></rss>