<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://www.slate.com/blogs/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>The XX Factor : Hollywood</title><link>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/Hollywood/default.aspx</link><description>Tags: Hollywood</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP2 (Build: 61129.2)</generator><item><title>Clinton/Lewinsky Scandal To Become HBO Movie</title><link>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/2009/03/25/clinton-lewinsky-scandal-to-become-hbo-movie.aspx</link><pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 20:41:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">b38b617e-fbf1-4816-b2a6-f11ec83af8cb:5088</guid><dc:creator>Susannah Breslin</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/comments/5088.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/commentrss.aspx?PostID=5088</wfw:commentRss><description>Just when you thought it was safe to channel surf, it turns out HBO is making a movie out of the Bill Clinton/Monica Lewinsky scandal of yesteryear. The title? The Special Relationship . Special , indeed. The casting is just plain odd. Dennis Quaid is...(&lt;a href="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/2009/03/25/clinton-lewinsky-scandal-to-become-hbo-movie.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://www.slate.com/blogs/aggbug.aspx?PostID=5088" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/Hillary+Clinton/default.aspx">Hillary Clinton</category><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/politics/default.aspx">politics</category><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/Bill+Clinton/default.aspx">Bill Clinton</category><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/movies/default.aspx">movies</category><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/sex/default.aspx">sex</category><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/Monica+Lewinsky/default.aspx">Monica Lewinsky</category><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/Hollywood/default.aspx">Hollywood</category><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/Tony+Blair/default.aspx">Tony Blair</category></item><item><title>Still More Reason to Lock Up Your Daughters</title><link>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/2009/03/20/still-more-reason-to-lock-up-your-daughters.aspx</link><pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2009 16:41:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">b38b617e-fbf1-4816-b2a6-f11ec83af8cb:5043</guid><dc:creator>Kerry Howley</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/comments/5043.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/commentrss.aspx?PostID=5043</wfw:commentRss><description>The talk of teacups and helicopters has me thinking about Taken , the fourth most popular movie in America and a film engineered to play on the worst, most irrational fears of American fathers—think Babel plus white slavery. A former CIA agent played...(&lt;a href="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/2009/03/20/still-more-reason-to-lock-up-your-daughters.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://www.slate.com/blogs/aggbug.aspx?PostID=5043" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/pop+culture/default.aspx">pop culture</category><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/virginity/default.aspx">virginity</category><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/Hollywood/default.aspx">Hollywood</category></item><item><title>Old Spice</title><link>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/2009/03/10/old-spice.aspx</link><pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 17:44:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">b38b617e-fbf1-4816-b2a6-f11ec83af8cb:4908</guid><dc:creator>Dahlia Lithwick</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/comments/4908.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/commentrss.aspx?PostID=4908</wfw:commentRss><description>Susannah . The headline here is actually kind of worse than “Julia Roberts is OLD.” The headline — or subhed — is the coy suggestion that “Julia Roberts is a superstar, but her box-office reign might be over.” Then the piece is packed with arguments (as...(&lt;a href="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/2009/03/10/old-spice.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://www.slate.com/blogs/aggbug.aspx?PostID=4908" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/motherhood/default.aspx">motherhood</category><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/Julia+Roberts/default.aspx">Julia Roberts</category><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/Hollywood/default.aspx">Hollywood</category><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/ageism/default.aspx">ageism</category></item><item><title>One Wedding, Three Children and ... a Funeral?</title><link>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/2009/03/10/one-wedding-three-children-and-a-funeral.aspx</link><pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 17:10:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">b38b617e-fbf1-4816-b2a6-f11ec83af8cb:4911</guid><dc:creator>Dana Stevens</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/comments/4911.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/commentrss.aspx?PostID=4911</wfw:commentRss><description>More for Susannah on Julia Roberts: I don't think either Dahlia or I were motivated to tear into that Newsweek piece on her by our undying love for America's sweetheart. Rather, we were struck by the article's disingenuousness, what I called its "eyelash-batting"...(&lt;a href="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/2009/03/10/one-wedding-three-children-and-a-funeral.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://www.slate.com/blogs/aggbug.aspx?PostID=4911" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/motherhood/default.aspx">motherhood</category><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/Julia+Roberts/default.aspx">Julia Roberts</category><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/Hollywood/default.aspx">Hollywood</category><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/Newsweek/default.aspx">Newsweek</category><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/aging/default.aspx">aging</category></item><item><title>That's Hollywood Ancient</title><link>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/2009/03/10/that-s-hollywood-ancient.aspx</link><pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 16:41:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">b38b617e-fbf1-4816-b2a6-f11ec83af8cb:4907</guid><dc:creator>Susannah Breslin</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/comments/4907.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/commentrss.aspx?PostID=4907</wfw:commentRss><description>Count me out on crying "sexism!" when it comes to Newsweek 's characterization of Julia Roberts as "Hollywood ancient." And that's exactly what the author said — Hollywood ancient — and you know what? He's absolutely right. By the response here, you'd...(&lt;a href="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/2009/03/10/that-s-hollywood-ancient.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://www.slate.com/blogs/aggbug.aspx?PostID=4907" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/movies/default.aspx">movies</category><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/sexism/default.aspx">sexism</category><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/Julia+Roberts/default.aspx">Julia Roberts</category><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/celebrity/default.aspx">celebrity</category><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/Hollywood/default.aspx">Hollywood</category></item><item><title>Pretty (Old) Woman</title><link>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/2009/03/10/pretty-old-woman.aspx</link><pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 14:51:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">b38b617e-fbf1-4816-b2a6-f11ec83af8cb:4905</guid><dc:creator>Dana Stevens</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/comments/4905.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/commentrss.aspx?PostID=4905</wfw:commentRss><description>Yuck. Like Dahlia , I hate the way this Newsweek article on Julia Roberts perpetuates sexist assumptions — 41-year-old women are "ancient"! Time off to raise children = career suicide! — while batting its eyelashes innocently. The author is effectively...(&lt;a href="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/2009/03/10/pretty-old-woman.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://www.slate.com/blogs/aggbug.aspx?PostID=4905" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/motherhood/default.aspx">motherhood</category><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/Julia+Roberts/default.aspx">Julia Roberts</category><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/Hollywood/default.aspx">Hollywood</category><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/Newsweek/default.aspx">Newsweek</category><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/aging/default.aspx">aging</category></item><item><title>Hollywood Ancient</title><link>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/2009/03/10/hollywood-ancient.aspx</link><pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 13:23:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">b38b617e-fbf1-4816-b2a6-f11ec83af8cb:4904</guid><dc:creator>Dahlia Lithwick</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/comments/4904.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/commentrss.aspx?PostID=4904</wfw:commentRss><description>Jamie Foxx. Paul Giamatti. Benicio Del Toro. Liev Schreiber. Guy Pearce. Philip Seymour Hoffman . Pretty safe bet that if any one of these 41-year-old actors had been the subject of this Newsweek piece they wouldn’t have been run through the gender double-standard...(&lt;a href="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/2009/03/10/hollywood-ancient.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://www.slate.com/blogs/aggbug.aspx?PostID=4904" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/motherhood/default.aspx">motherhood</category><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/Julia+Roberts/default.aspx">Julia Roberts</category><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/Hollywood/default.aspx">Hollywood</category></item></channel></rss>