-
Posted
Wednesday, November 04, 2009 3:28 PM
| By
Rachael Larimore
Amanda,
Before I begin, I want to clarify something. I’m not “anti-choice.”
I am anti-abortion. That might sound like semantics, but I think it’s a
sign of the gulf between abortion-rights supporters and abortion foes.
“Anti-choice” has a connotation of “anti-woman,” that being against
abortion means you think women shouldn’t have control over their
bodies. I will defend until my dying day a woman’s right to choose
whether to have sex. I think the pill might have been the greatest
invention of the 20th century. I’m all for passing out condoms in high
schools. Adoption should be easy, and birth mothers should be able to
have open or closed adoptions. Women who choose to keep their children
and who need help should have access to financial assistance and other
support programs that will enable them to be productive and gain
employment and raise their children. I just can’t support abortion. And
frankly, I can’t think of many pro-lifers I know who feel differently.
Yes, there are some who think sex is strictly for marriage and
procreation. But you’re not going to make any headway with them. If the
pro-choice and pro-life sides are to have any hope of working together
to reduce the number of abortions, which should everyone’s goal, we
need to try to understand one another and stop what’s essentially
name-calling ... (Read the rest of this article in DoubleX).
About Rachael Larimore
- Rachael Larimore is Slate's copy chief.
|
| S | M | T | W | T | F | S |
| 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 |
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 |
| 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 |
| 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 |
| 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 |
| 29 | 30 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
Join the Fray: our reader discussion forum
What did you think of this article?