-
Posted
Wednesday, March 11, 2009 3:16 PM
| By
Ann Hulbert
I've been waiting for your breast-feeding article, Hanna, so thanks for the alert that it's now out in the Atlantic, Emily. The piece is great, and persuades me that nursing isn't the secret to thinner, smarter, healthier babies—certainly not among the well-off set that swears by the practice. It also reminded me of the many reasons nursing isn't exactly the secret to well-rested, maritally contented, productively employed mothers, either. Which leaves me with a question: Why is it that the pro-breast-feeding brigade has had such success peddling its message at precisely the moment when you would think women would be least receptive to it?
Clearly the audience is complicit here: At the turn of the 20th century, the newly scientific experts peddled their intricate formula recipes not because they were better or safer (back then, when cow milk supplies were dicey, they were anything but). They peddled them because they were well-aware that middle-class "modern" mothers were eager not to be tied down all day the way their mothers had been. So how do you read the peculiar eagerness among mothers recently, as they stream into the workforce, to, well, swallow the opposite, highly inconvenient expertise? In the video accompanying your piece, you and your friends touched on this, confirming my sense that nursing isn't about helping our kids to ace their SATs. Isn't it more about helping to reassure ourselves that we mothers really are indispensable?
Join the Fray: our reader discussion forum
What did you think of this article?