Monday, January 14, 2008 - Posts
-
Were you just being provocative, Emily ? Describing a best-case abortion as nothing more than "a few not ideal hours'' makes it sound like an afternoon at the DMV without a good book. And aren't you being just as categorical as you say Caitlin Flanagan Read More...
-
Back to Hillaryland (because who can stay out for long?): Who is she kidding when she said to Tim Russert yesterday , about herself and Obama, "I don't think either of one of us want to inject race and gender in this campaign"? I'm pretty much in favor Read More...
-
Emily: You nailed the problem with Flanagan's piece—the overarching, equalizing is that so officiously announces to women how "they" experience the world. Everyone's a Platonist when it comes to teenage girls and sex. One thing that was great about Juno Read More...
-
Dahlia , agreed entirely. And now on to a subject that lies somewhere between the CIA and nail polish: Caitlin Flanagan's complaints about the movie Juno in the NYT over the weekend. (Did anyone else notice that the Times ' Sunday op-ed pages were practially Read More...
-
Erica Jong posted yesterday on the embarrassing lack of substance in our political coverage. I don’t disagree on the merits. The media (ourselves included) have now devoted exponentially more energy to Hillary’s non-tears in Portsmouth, than they have Read More...
Join the Fray: our reader discussion forum
What did you think of this article?