<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://www.slate.com/blogs/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Trailhead : media, Rudy Giuliani</title><link>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/trailhead/archive/tags/media/Rudy+Giuliani/default.aspx</link><description>Tags: media, Rudy Giuliani</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP2 (Build: 61129.2)</generator><item><title>CNN's 'hit job'</title><link>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/trailhead/archive/2007/11/29/cnn-s-hit-job.aspx</link><pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2007 20:45:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">b38b617e-fbf1-4816-b2a6-f11ec83af8cb:352</guid><dc:creator>Chadwick Matlin</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/trailhead/comments/352.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/trailhead/commentrss.aspx?PostID=352</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;The &lt;a href="http://www.cnn.com/2007/POLITICS/11/29/giuliani.records/index.html" title="http://www.cnn.com/2007/POLITICS/11/29/giuliani.records/index.html"&gt;lead 
story&lt;/a&gt; (as of 4:30 p.m.) on CNNPolitics.com has a headline that seems like a &lt;span class="487140921-29112007"&gt;veiled &lt;/span&gt;insult at Politico.com, its 
web-journalism competitor. Referring to Politico's &lt;a href="http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1107/7073.html" title="http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1107/7073.html"&gt;agenda-setting 
story&lt;/a&gt; on Giuliani's questionable expense allocations after trips to the 
Hamptons, the story's headline reads, "Giuliani: Web site report a 'hit 
job'"&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Guys, that's pretty Web 0.0 of you. Sure the story originally appeared on a web site, but if Congress 
wasn't out of town, it would have been published&amp;nbsp;&lt;span class="487140921-29112007"&gt;in Politico's print edition, as well&lt;/span&gt;. (Politico suspends its 
hard-copy daily when Congress is in recess.) To refer to it as a "web site 
report" rather than something like the&amp;nbsp; "questionable expense report" or the "Hampton flap" only makes the story sound illegitimate.&lt;span class="487140921-29112007"&gt; I understand it was probably unintentional, but it's 
an interesting glimpse into CNN's psyche, nonetheless.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.slate.com/blogs/aggbug.aspx?PostID=352" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/trailhead/archive/tags/Rudy+Giuliani/default.aspx">Rudy Giuliani</category><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/trailhead/archive/tags/media/default.aspx">media</category></item></channel></rss>