Trailhead: A campaign blog.



  • « Prev | Main | Next »

    Double Team

    With tonight’s Democratic debate billed as a three-way showdown, it looks like Obama and Edwards have signed a temporary non-aggression pact in order to focus all their audacity and hope on Hillary.

    Obama announced over the weekend that he plans to start talking tough with Clinton. Then yesterday, Edwards lobbed the first grenade, attacking Hillary’s integrity in a lofty speech his campaign billed as “definitional,” “Senator Clinton's road to the middle class,” he said, “takes a major detour right through the deep canyon of corporate lobbyists and the hidden bidding of K Street in Washington -- and history tells us that when that bus stops there it is the middle class that loses.” 

    Both attacks come at slightly different angles. Obama challenges Hillary’s policy ideas. He’s been tweaking her for her Iran vote—not to mention her Iraq authorization—and pushing her to give details on how she’d fix Social Security. (So far, she won’t say whether she’s willing to raise the retirement age or lift the cap on collecting Social Security taxes.) On Iran, he’s questioning her judgment. On Social Security, he’s daring her to give a straight answer. But in both cases, he can dodge her accusation that he has “abandoned the politics of hope” by insisting that he’s focusing on policy.

    Edwards, meanwhile, is going after Hillary’s character. He pointed out yesterday that she has “taken more money from Washington lobbyists than any candidate from either party -- more money than any Republican candidate.” He’s not just talking about policy tweaks. He’s saying that she’s part of the “bankrupt ways of Washington.” It’s risky to sell the primary as a referendum on character, since personal attacks never reflect well on the attacker. But Edwards knows that for some voters, Hillary is on shaky ground already. An extra tremor, he figures, and the earth will open up.

    With attacks coming from both sides—perhaps literally—Hillary will have to play some serious D. But it could also play to her advantage. If they go too hard on her, they might come off looking like bullies. If they go too easy, she could just swat them away with a laugh and a joke about getting attention from men. Either way, they will only solidify her status as the one to beat.

About Christopher Beam

  • Christopher Beam is a Slate political reporter.
0 Comments
<October 2007>
SMTWTFS
30123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28293031123
45678910
Print This ArticlePRINT Discuss in the FrayDISCUSS

Syndication