<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://www.slate.com/blogs/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Convictions : Hamdan v. Rumsfeld, secret evidence</title><link>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/convictions/archive/tags/Hamdan+v.+Rumsfeld/secret+evidence/default.aspx</link><description>Tags: Hamdan v. Rumsfeld, secret evidence</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP2 (Build: 61129.2)</generator><item><title>Vive les États-Unis</title><link>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/convictions/archive/2008/05/15/vive-les-etas-unis.aspx</link><pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 15:05:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">b38b617e-fbf1-4816-b2a6-f11ec83af8cb:2867</guid><dc:creator>Emily Bazelon</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/convictions/comments/2867.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/convictions/commentrss.aspx?PostID=2867</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;SPAN style="FONT-SIZE:10pt;COLOR:black;FONT-FAMILY:Arial;"&gt;&lt;A class="" href="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/convictions/archive/2008/05/15/donnez-moi-la-fourchette.aspx" target=_blank&gt;Also&lt;/A&gt;, our point wasn’t to issue any sort of blanket indictment of military justice, or American justice, as a whole. To the contrary. Same government, yes, but very different rules—and&amp;nbsp;in the traditional court systems, it’s the courts that make those rules, not the executive branch. Not so for the tribunals. That was one of the&amp;nbsp;main bases in the first place&amp;nbsp;for&amp;nbsp;Salim Hamdan's suit challenging the commissions&amp;nbsp;in.&amp;nbsp;In the wake of the Supreme Court's decision in his favor, Congress got into the act, both verifying the Bush administration's call to establish the tribunals&amp;nbsp;and demanding a higher standard of due process for them. We'll find out in June, presumably,&amp;nbsp;how that sits with the justices.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.slate.com/blogs/aggbug.aspx?PostID=2867" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/convictions/archive/tags/Guantanamo/default.aspx">Guantanamo</category><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/convictions/archive/tags/military+commissions/default.aspx">military commissions</category><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/convictions/archive/tags/Hamdan+v.+Rumsfeld/default.aspx">Hamdan v. Rumsfeld</category><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/convictions/archive/tags/France/default.aspx">France</category><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/convictions/archive/tags/secret+evidence/default.aspx">secret evidence</category></item></channel></rss>