Convictions: Slate's blog on legal issues



  • « Prev | Main | Next »

    Open Minds and Munaf

    Phil, the Supremes have time-honored words ready-made to make your Munaf point. Here's the theme, from the court's 1949 opinion in Watts (p. 52), quoted verbatim in the 2004 Padilla dissent (p. 11 n.10):

    And there comes a point where this Court should not be ignorant as judges of what we know as men.

    (And woman, one might add.) The theme's found, too, in this from Chief Justice Howard Taft, in the 1922 Child Labor Tax Case (p. 37):

    All others can see and understand this. How can we properly shut our minds to it?

Print This ArticlePRINT Discuss in the FrayDISCUSS
<March 2008>
SMTWTFS
2425262728291
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
303112345
Join the Fray: our reader discussion forum
What did you think of this article?
POST A MESSAGE | READ MESSAGES

Syndication